- Project management. Software vendors and VARs will
typically provide a technical lead or project manager, but it is the
client’s responsibility to manage the overall project. Activities such as
budget and scope management, risk mitigation, and vendor oversight are not
generally handled by the vendor.
- Functional scope. Most fixed-bid contracts are
very clear about what is and, more importantly, what is not in scope. It
is important to have a clear understanding of which of your business
requirements are going to be addressed in their scope as opposed to
modules that have been excluded from scope. In addition, vendors often
include a clause that states the customer will not make changes to a
pre-configured solution, which may limit your flexibility to change the
software as needed.
- Business process and workflow definition. Software vendors will
generally configure and, if necessary, customize the software as required.
However, it is up to the customer to define the business processes and
workflows so the vendor’s technical resources can configure and customize
the software accordingly. Although not included in a vendor’s scope, this
can be a complex and time-consuming internal process if not managed
appropriately.
- Customization. Most fixed-bid contracts
assume that the customer will use the software 100% as-is. Customization
is generally not included in scope and will result in additional costs.
- Data migration. It is typically the customer’s
responsibility to clean up data, define the mapping from the old to the
new system, and migrate the data. We find this to be an area where clients
create delays by delaying data migration until late in the project.
- Training. Vendor contracts generally call for the
vendor to train the customer’s trainers using their boilerplate training
materials. it is the customer’s responsibility to tailor training to meet
the company’s specific needs, workflows, and roles and responsibilities.
It is also usually the customer’s responsibility to train end-users and
employees on the new system.
- Organizational change management and
communications. This area is omitted from vendor contracts an overwhelming
majority of the time. In order for an ERP
implementation to be successful, key organizational change
activities such as departmental process change discussions, process gap
analysis, organizational and job design, and security/profile definition
all need to be addressed.
- Forms and reports. The vendor will generally
provide a wide array of forms and reports that can be used out-of-the-box.
However, it is up to the customer to define which of them will be used and
modify them if needed to meet their business intelligence needs.
- Internal controls and Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX)
compliance.
Vendors generally do not address any required internal controls that may
be unique to your business. Although some ERP solutions protectively build
SOX and regulatory controls into their software, it is up to your internal
audit team to ensure that the software will address internal controls as
designed.
- ERP benefits realization. Go-live is not the finish line
for a successful ERP implementation. It is often the adjustments and
improvements made after go-live that ultimately determine how beneficial
the enterprise software will be to your organization. Post go-live audits,
process improvements, refresher training, and configuration changes are
important steps to optimize your return on investment.
Although the above activities are critical to ERP success, they are generally not included in an enterprise software vendor’s implementation scope. This is not necessarily a bad thing. However, it is important to factor these activities into your overall implementation duration and budget to ensure that your ERP project is successful.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder